For the charterer. An independent perspective.Your saved research

Market data and deal flow · Using the research

What remains unknown—and what should the desk track next?

Short answer

The major public-data weakness is the gap between marketed supply and completed, comparable transactions. This review did not establish an audited 24m-plus revenue total, US-resident expenditure share, market-wide realised discount series or independently verified live availability.

Aerial view of a marina full of large yachts

A repeatable quarterly dataset should request:

  • Unique yacht identity and length threshold, with duplicate listings removed.
  • Contract count, charter days and completed versus cancelled bookings.
  • Advertised fee and agreed fee for the same currency, dates and duration.
  • Guest residence separately from broker office and cruising destination.
  • Base fee separately from tax, operating expenditure and gratuity.
  • Owner-use and maintenance blocks separately from paid charter weeks.
  • New-to-charter yachts separately from changes of central agent.
  • Quote-to-deposit timing and documented reasons a shortlist failed.

These are proposed research fields, not data the desk currently possesses. Search-demand volumes and claims that particular buyer queries are “trending” were not measured in this pass.

Bottom line: public evidence supports an active, growing charter market and a wide range of asking prices. It does not support a universal discount, an exact US-origin market size or a guarantee of availability. The organiser’s strongest next step is a dated, yacht-specific comparison of fit, cash requirements and unresolved conditions—not reliance on a headline market-growth figure.

Sources cited

This page does not link to an external source directly.

All sources for Market data and deal flow